| Educational guide Faculty of Oenology |
english |
| Bachelor's Degree in Biotechnology (2009) |
 Subjects |
| BIOREACTOR ENGINEERING |
| Assessment |
| IDENTIFYING DATA | 2022_23 |
| Subject | BIOREACTOR ENGINEERING | Code | 19204119 | |||||
| Study programme |
|
Cycle | 1st | |||||
| Descriptors | Credits | Type | Year | Period | ||||
| 4 | Compulsory | Third | 2Q |
|||||
| Competences | Learning outcomes | Contents |
| Planning | Methodologies | Personalized attention |
| Assessment | Sources of information | Recommendations |
| Methodologies | Competences | Description | Weight | ||||
| Problem solving, exercises |
|
Moodle questionnaires to be solved at home (out of class) within school hours. Between 4 and 6 questionnaires will be planned. The questionnaires will have questions with various answer options or with basic numerical calculations. The duration of each questionnaire will be between 30 and 60 minutes. | 15% | ||||
| Laboratory practicals |
|
I. Aerobic fermentation. II. Anaerobic fermentation. III. Production of a secondary metabolite. IV. Production of a molecule of interest. V. Enzymatic catalysis. (Internships must be approved to average) |
25% | ||||
| Mixed tests |
|
Partial exam and two hours (24%). Syllabus: topics covered to date. Partial exam II three hours (36%). Syllabus: all topics. (You must take a weighted average of the two exams of at least 4 to be able to average) |
60% | ||||
| Others |
| Other comments and second exam session | |||
|
Second call: Exam 60% (the whole syllabus) Resolved activities 15% (The marks obtained in the continuous assessment are retained) Internship report 25% (Grades obtained in the continuous assessment are retained) In the event that the grades of the solved activities and the internship report harm the student, they will not be taken into account, then the weight of the second call exam will be 100%. During assessment tests, mobile phones, tablets and other devices not expressly authorized by the test must be switched off and out of sight. The demonstratively fraudulent realization of some evaluative activity of some asignatura so much in material support as virtual and electronic carries to the student the note of suspense of this evaluative activity. Regardless of this, given the gravity of the facts, the center may propose the initiation of a disciplinary proceeding, which will be initiated by resolution of the rector. |
|||
