Type A
|
Code |
Competences Specific | | A2 |
Masters the main linguistic bases of theoretical and applied linguistics |
| A3 |
Has an advanced knowledge of English at all levels, both in speaking and writing; also knows the linguistic system of English (lexical, phonetic, grammatical, pragmatic, discourse) and can give it an adequate didactic treatment |
| A5 |
Identifies, describes, analyses, and evaluates resources, strategies, methods and didactic processes used in teaching English, and applies them adequately in any EFL/ESL context, in line with students’ needs |
| A6 |
Plans, structures, and designs didactic units; programs and organizes the contents of the discipline in diverse contexts bearing in mind the different rhythms in learning English |
Type B
|
Code |
Competences Transversal | | B1 |
Learning to learn |
| B6 |
Clear and effective communication of information, ideas, problems and solutions in public or a specific technical field |
Type C
|
Code |
Competences Nuclear |
Type A
|
Code |
Learning outcomes |
| A2 |
Identifies and analyses the basic units as well as teaching and learning strategies to develop a global communicative competence (discursive, textual, pragmatic) in English
| | A3 |
Critically reflects on the teaching-learning of the different linguistic levels (grammar, lexicon, phonetics, and pragmatics) and analyses, elaborates, compares and evaluates didactic proposals to tackle them
Critically reflects on studies in the field of interlanguage pragmatics
| | A5 |
Analyses, compares, evaluates and selects appropriate materials to present, practice and correct elements of the pronunciation, grammar, lexicon and pragmatics of English
Argues and reasons why, when and how to work on the pronunciation, grammar, lexicon and pragmatics of English
| | A6 |
Elaborates practical proposals and activities to include the different linguistic competences (pragmatics, grammar, lexicon, phonetics) in the teaching plan
|
Type B
|
Code |
Learning outcomes |
| B1 |
Learn by asking questions and take an interest in clearing up doubts.
| | B6 |
Structure their presentations and comply with any requirements should there be any.
Reply to the questions that they are asked.
Understand that non-verbal language is appropriate to verbal discourse.
|
Type C
|
Code |
Learning outcomes |
Topic |
Sub-topic |
UNIT 1 - BASIC CONCEPTS IN PRAGMATICS |
|
UNIT 2 - SPEECH ACTS |
|
UNIT 3 - MODELS OF COMMUNICATION |
|
UNIT 4 - POLITENESS & FACE |
|
UNIT 5 - CROSS-CULTURAL PRAGMATICS |
|
UNIT 6 - INTERLANGUAGE PRAGMATICS |
|
UNIT 7 - TEACHING PRAGMATICS IN THE EFL CLASSROOM |
|
Methodologies :: Tests |
|
Competences |
(*) Class hours
|
Hours outside the classroom
|
(**) Total hours |
Introductory activities |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
Lecture |
|
12 |
12 |
24 |
Problem solving, exercises in the classroom |
|
12 |
10 |
22 |
Presentations / oral communications |
|
3 |
8 |
11 |
Assignments |
|
1 |
15 |
16 |
Personal attention |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
(*) On e-learning, hours of virtual attendance of the teacher. (**) The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students. |
Methodologies
|
Description |
Introductory activities |
Description and presentation of the course contents. |
Lecture |
Explanation of the various linguistic tools and theories leading to intercultural and communicative pragmatics and their application in the EFL classroom. |
Problem solving, exercises in the classroom |
Discussion and practice of basic concepts. Proposals to deal with pragmatic issues, differences and conflicts in the teaching and learning of EFL/ESL. |
Presentations / oral communications |
Oral presentation of a didactic proposal. |
Assignments |
Critical reading, review of material, writing a didactic unit. |
Personal attention |
Students will be in touch with the instructor (individual appointments, email or Moodle). |
Description |
Students will be in touch with the instructors (individual appointments, email or Moodle). |
Methodologies |
Competences
|
Description |
Weight |
|
|
|
|
Presentations / oral communications |
|
Oral presentations on teaching pragmatic content. |
40% |
Assignments |
|
Project |
20% |
Others |
|
Exam |
40% |
|
Other comments and second exam session |
Exact details on assessment and requirements will be provided on the first day of classes. |
Basic |
|
Alcón, E. (2005). Does instruction work for pragmatic learning in EFL contexts? System 33: 417-435 Austin,J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: OUP. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Teaching Pragmatics. Washington DC: US Department of State Office of English Language Programs. Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome. Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Rose & Kasper (eds.) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-60. Horn, L., & Ward, G. (Eds.) (2006). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225-253. Leech,G.N. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness.Oxford: OUP. Levinson,S.C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385-399. Searle,J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: CUP. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Terkourafi,
M. (2016). The linguistics of politeness and social relations. In K. Allan
(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 221-235). New York: Routledge. Watts, R.J.(2003). Politeness.Cambridge: CUP. |
Complementary |
|
|
(*)The teaching guide is the document in which the URV publishes the information about all its courses. It is a public document and cannot be modified. Only in exceptional cases can it be revised by the competent agent or duly revised so that it is in line with current legislation. |
|