Referències per temes ·
La investigació etnogràfica en el camp de la salut: dilemes i desafiaments
metodològics i socials o
Anspach, R et Mizrahi N. (2006) “THE FIELD
WORKER'S FIELDS: ETHICS, ETHNOGRAPHY AND MEDICAL SOCIOLOGY”, Sociology of
Health and Illness, 28-6, 713-731 o
Barrio-Cantalejo,
I. M. & Simón-Lorda P. (2006) “Problemas éticos de la investigación
cualitativa”, Med Clin (Barc), 126(11): 418-23. o
Finkler, K. (2004) “Biomedicine globalized and localized:
western medical practices in an outpatient clinic of a Mexican hospital”, Social Science
& Medicine, Volume
59, Issue 10, Pages 2037-2051 o
Inhorn, M. C. (2004) “Privacy, privatization,
and the politics of patronage: ethnographic challenges to penetrating the
secret world of Middle Eastern, hospital-based in vitro fertilization”, Social
Science & Medicine Volume 59, Issue 10, Pages 2095-2108 o
Marshall, P. A. (2003) “Human Subjects
Protections, Institutional Review Boards, and Cultural Anthropological
Research”. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(2): 269-285. o
Van der Geest, S (2003) “CONFIDENTIALITY AND
PSEUDONYMS: A FIELDWORK DILEMMA FROM GHANA”, Anthropology Today, 19:1, p.
14-18; o
Van der Geest, S., Finkler, K. (2004), “Hospital
ethnography: introduction”, Social Science & Medicine 59, 1995–2001 ·
La bio-medicalizació de l'inici de la vida i l'impacte de les tecnologies
audiovisuals: el avortament i el fetus "persona" o
Bestard J. (2005) “Com fer
visible l’interior del cos o diferents maneres d’imaginar el fetus”. Quaderns
de l’Intitut Català d’Antropologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 21:
72-89. o De Zordo,
S. (2017) “From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’:
Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation
in Italy and Cataluña”, Global Public Health (Special Issue: “Re-situating
Abortion: Bio-politics, Global Health and Rights in Neo-liberal Times”):
711-723. o Duden, B.
(1999) “The Fetus on the “farther shore”. Towards a history of the unborn”, in
Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions, University of Pennsylvania Press,
Philadelphia, pp. 13-25. o Howes-Mischell,
R. (2016) “WITH THIS YOU CAN MEET YOUR BABY: FETAL PERSONHOOD AND AUDIBLE
HEARTBEATS IN OAXACAN PUBLIC HEALTH”, Medical Anthropology Quarterly,
30:2-186-202. o Kaufman,
S. R. & Morgan, L. M. (2005) THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE BEGINNINGS AND ENDS OF
LIFE, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 34:317-341, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120452 o Mattalucci
C. (2012) “Pro-Life Activism, Abortion and Subjectivity Before Birth:
Discursive Practices and Anthropological Perspectives”. Mediterranean Journal
of Social Sciences, 3(10), 109-118. o Morgan
L.M. (2006) “Life begins when they steal your bicycle”, Journal of Law,
Medicine &Ethics: 8-15. o Michaels
M. W. (1999) “Some questions about what we see”, in Fetal Subjects, Feminist
Positions, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 113-131. o Petchesky,
R.P. (1987) “The Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction”,
Feminist Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2: 263-292. o Rapp R.
(2000) “The disabled fetal imaginary”, in Testing women, Testing the Fetus,
Routledge, NY & London, pp. 128-164 ·
Métodos etnogràfics versus mètodes mixtos: els desafiaments i els límits de
la investigació transdisciplinària i de la teoria fonamentada com a metodologia
de recerca o Bryant,
A. & Charmaz, K. Eds. (2007). The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London:
Sage Publications. (en particular: Introduction and Part I, chapter 1) o Coast E.
E., Hampshire K. R., Randall S. C. (2007) “Disciplining anthropological
demography”, Demographic Research, 16 (article 16): 493-518. o Creswell
et al. (2011) “Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health
Sciences”. Bethesda: NIH. o Gerdts
C., De Zordo S., Mishtal J., Barr-Walker Jill, Lohr Patricia, “Experiences of
women who travel in England for abortion: an exploratory pilot-study”, The
European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, Aug. 2016: 21
(5): 401-407. o Hamui-Sutton A. (2013) “Un
acercamiento a los métodos mixtos de investigación en educación médica”. o Kroll, T.
& Neri, M. (2009) “Designs for Mixed Methods Research”, in Andrew S.,
Halcomb, Mixed Methods Research for Nursing and the Health Science, Wiley-Blackwell,
pp. 31-49. o Martin, L.
E. et al. (2018) “Evaluation of Abortion Stigma in the Workforce: Development of
the Revised Abortion Providers Stigma Scale”, Women's Health Issues, 28:
159–67. o Mishtal,
J. Z. (2009) “Understanding low fertility in Poland: Demographic consequences
of gendered discrimination in employment and postsocialist neoliberal
restructuring”, Demographic Research, 21 (article 20): 599-626. o Muñoz Justicia, J. (2005).
Análisis cualitativo de datos textuales con ATLAS.ti 5. (http://psicologiasocial.uab.es/juan/index.php/investigacion-mainmenu-42/publicaciones-mainmenu-45/41-atlas2005). o Sandelowski,
M. (2000). “Focus on Research Methods Combining Qualitative and Quantitative
Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies”.
Research in Nursing & Health, 23: 246–255. o Steinberg,
JR, McCulloch, C.E., Adler, N.E. (2014) “Abortion and mental health: findings
from The National Comorbidity Survey-Replication”. Obstet Gynecol., 123(2 Pt
1): 263-70. o Van Ditzhuijzen, J.et al. (2017).
“Does abortion increase the incidence and recurrence of mkental disorders on
the long term?”, in Abortion and mental health, Ridderprint BV, pp. 83-94. ·
La investigació i antropologia feminista i aplicada: traspassant fronteres o Bullen, M. (2012) “Antropología
feminista, antropología aplicada. Encuentros y desencuentros”. Revista de
Antropologi?a Experimental, Monogra?fico: Antropología en España: Nuevos
Caminos Profesionales, n. 12: 92-102. o Cubillos Almendra, J. (2015). “La
importancia de la interseccionalidad para la investigación feminista”, Oxímora.
Revista internacional de ética y política, 7: 119-137. o D'Andrade,
R. (1995), “Moral Models in Anthropology”, Current Anthropology, Vol. 36, No.
3: 399-408. o Estalella, A. & Sánchez
Criado, T. (2016) Temas emergentes - Colaboraciones experimentales: una
modalidad etnográfica, Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares, Vol
71, No 1: 9-73. o Fassin D,
(2008) “Beyond good and evil? Questioning the anthropological discomfort with
morals”, Anthropological Theory, vol. 8, issue 4: 333-344 o Gregorio Gil, C. (2014)
“Traspasando las fronteras dentro-fuera: Reflexiones desde una etnografía
feminista”. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, vol. 9, n. 3:
297-322. o Lugones, M. (2005).
“Multiculturalismo radical y feminismos de mujeres de color”, Revista
Internacional de Filosofía Política, 25: 61-76. o Robles-Silva, L. (2012) “Dilemas
éticos en el trabajo de campo: temas olvidados en la investigación cualitativa
en salud en Iberoamérica”. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, vol.17, n.3:
603-612. o Scheper-Hughes,
N. (1995). “The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant
Anthropology”, Current Anthropology, 36(3): 409-440. ·
Etnografia digital o Adolfo,
E. & Ardèvol, E. (2007) “Ética de campo: hacia una ética situada para la
investigación etnográfica de internet”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /
Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8 (3), 19: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs070328 o Beneito-Montagut,
R., Begueria, A. & Cassián, N. (2017) “Doing digital team ethnography:
being there together and digital social data”, Qualitative Research, Vol 17,
Issue 6, pp. 664 – 682. o Hine, C.
(2015). Ethnography for the Internet: embedded, embodied and everyday. London,
UK; New York, NY, USA: Bloomsbury Academic, cap. 2: pp.19-54. o Jociles, MI. & Rubio, BL.
(2016) “Las comunidades virtuales como marcos de cuidados horizontales entre
mujeres: el caso de las familias que acuden a la donación reproductiva en
España”. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, v. 11, n. 2: 199 – 224. o Pink, S. et a. (2016). Digital
Ethnography. Sage. ·
L'ús del dibuix a la investigació qualificativa en
salut o Coad, J.
& Lewis, AL. (2004). Engaging children and young people in research.
Literature Review for NECF (National
EvaluationoftheChildren'sFund).Birmingham:UniversityofBirmingham,InstituteofAppliedSocial
Studies. o Nic
Gabhainn, S. & Kelleher, C. (2002). “The sensitivity of the draw and write
technique”. Health Education, 102(2): 68-75. o Horstman,
M. et al. (2008). “Methodological Issues When Using the Draw and Write
Technique With Children Aged 6 to 12 Years”. Qualitative health Research,
18(7): 1001-1011. o McIntosh,
C. et al. (2012). “Young children’s meaning making about the causes of
illness within the family context”. Health, 17(1): 3-19. o Muñoz, A. (2016) «¡Cuida tu
cuerpo!»: Los niños y la gestión de significados en torno a la salud. Martí,
Josep; Porzio, Laura (eds.). Cuerpos y agencia en la arena social. Madrid:
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 2016. pp. 195 – 216 Referències generals o Bernard,
HR (2006) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative
Approaches. Oxford: Altamira Press. o ESTEBAN, M.L.; COMELLES, J.M.;
DÍEZ MINTEGUI, C. (2010) Antropología, género, salud y atención. Barcelona:
Edicions Bellaterra (en particular: Prólogo, capítulos 1-2). o Lock, M.
& Nguyen, V.K. (2010), An Anthropology of Biomedicine,Wiley-Blackwell (en
particular: Introduction, Part I, chapter 1). o Pujadas, J.J. Ed. (2010).
Etnografía. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. o Kleinman,
A. Writing at the margins, Universiy of California Press, 1995 (en particular:
chapters 2-3-9). o Valles, M.-S. (1999): Técnicas
cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica
profesional. Madrid: Síntesis |