Type A
|
Code |
Competences Specific | | A2 |
Masters the main linguistic bases of theoretical and applied linguistics |
| A3 |
Has an advanced knowledge of English at all levels, both in speaking and writing; also knows the linguistic system of English (lexical, phonetic, grammatical, pragmatic, discourse) and can give it an adequate didactic treatment |
| A5 |
Identifies, describes, analyses, and evaluates resources, strategies, methods and didactic processes used in teaching English, and applies them adequately in any EFL/ESL context, in line with students’ needs |
| A6 |
Plans, structures, and designs didactic units; programs and organizes the contents of the discipline in diverse contexts bearing in mind the different rhythms in learning English |
Type B
|
Code |
Competences Transversal | | B1 |
Learning to learn |
| B6 |
Communicate information, ideas, conclusions, problems and solutions – and the underlying reasons – clearly and effectively in public or in a particular technical ambit. |
Type C
|
Code |
Competences Nuclear |
Type A
|
Code |
Learning outcomes |
| A2 |
Identifies and analyses the basic units as well as teaching and learning strategies to develop a global communicative competence (discursive, textual, pragmatic) in English
| | A3 |
Critically reflects on the teaching-learning of the different linguistic levels (grammar, lexicon, phonetics, and pragmatics) and analyses, elaborates, compares and evaluates didactic proposals to tackle them
Critically reflects on studies in the field of interlanguage pragmatics
| | A5 |
Analyses, compares, evaluates and selects appropriate materials to present, practice and correct elements of the pronunciation, grammar, lexicon and pragmatics of English
Argues and reasons why, when and how to work on the pronunciation, grammar, lexicon and pragmatics of English
| | A6 |
Elaborates practical proposals and activities to include the different linguistic competences (pragmatics, grammar, lexicon, phonetics) in the teaching plan
|
Type B
|
Code |
Learning outcomes |
| B1 |
Learn by asking questions and take an interest in clearing up doubts.
| | B6 |
Structure their presentations and comply with any requirements should there be any.
Reply to the questions that they are asked.
Understand that non-verbal language is appropriate to verbal discourse.
|
Type C
|
Code |
Learning outcomes |
Topic |
Sub-topic |
Week 1: 1) Module overview. 2) What is pragmatics? |
|
Week 2: 1) Conversational implicatures. 2) Scalar implicatures. |
|
Week 3: 1) Deixis, presupposition, metaphor. |
|
Week 4: 1) Speech acts. |
|
Week 5: 1) Conversational structure. |
|
Week 6: 1) Politeness. 2) Positive and negative face. |
|
Week 7: 1) Experimental pragmatics and first language acquisition. |
|
Week 8: 1) Can semantics be dissociated from pragmatics? 2) Grammatical illusions as semantico-pragmatic constructs. |
|
Week 9: 1) Pragmatics in the EFL classroom. |
|
Week 10: 1) Oral presentations. 2) Q&A sessions and feedback for the final written assignment. |
|
Week 11: 1) Oral presentations. 2) A hands-on approach to pragmatics: Analyzing advertisements, movies, and humor. |
|
Methodologies :: Tests |
|
Competences |
(*) Class hours
|
Hours outside the classroom
|
(**) Total hours |
Introductory activities |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
Lecture |
|
16 |
12 |
28 |
Problem solving, exercises in the classroom |
|
11 |
5 |
16 |
Presentations / oral communications |
|
4 |
9 |
13 |
Assignments |
|
1 |
15 |
16 |
Personal attention |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
(*) On e-learning, hours of virtual attendance of the teacher. (**) The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students. |
Methodologies
|
Description |
Introductory activities |
Description and presentation of the course contents. |
Lecture |
Introduction and analysis of the main topics of the course. Presentation of their application in the EFL classroom. |
Problem solving, exercises in the classroom |
Discussion and practice of basic concepts. Proposals to deal with pragmatic issues, differences and conflicts in the teaching and learning of EFL/ESL. |
Presentations / oral communications |
Oral presentation of a didactic proposal. |
Assignments |
Critical reading, review of material, writing a didactic unit. |
Personal attention |
Students will be in touch with the instructor (individual appointments, email or Moodle). |
Description |
Students can be in touch with me at evelina.leivada@urv.cat. Also,
individual appointments are possible in and outside office hours (see
syllabus). Due to the current emergency health
situation, in the 2020-21 academic year
students will be able to consult their teachers in individual and/or
group tutorials if they have any questions or queries on subject-related
issues. Students will receive a schedule for these tutorials at the
start of the course and be informed what form they
will take (i.e. whether they will be held face-to-face, online, via
email or on Moodle, etc.). |
Methodologies |
Competences
|
Description |
Weight |
|
|
|
|
Presentations / oral communications |
|
Oral presentations |
30% |
Assignments |
|
Final written assignment |
40% |
Others |
|
Short online activities and participation in class |
30% |
|
Other comments and second exam session |
This teaching guide is provisional only. If any health emergency arises it will be adapted in order to comply with the directives issued by the competent bodies. Any modification will be announced via the news forum on the Moodle online campus. |
Basic |
|
Main textbook: Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. (1997/2008 edition). Other main readings:
Irun Chavarria, M. & E. Baiget Bonany. 2006. Raising awareness of
pragmatics in the EFL classroom: A proposal. Revista de Estudios
Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, 133-144. Katsos, N., M.-J. Ezeizabarrena, A. Gavarró, J. Kuva? Kraljevi?, G. Hrzica, K. K. Grohmann, A. Skordi et al. [+ 50 authors]. 2012. The acquisition of quantification across languages: Some predictions. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung & A. E. Kimball (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 258-268. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Maillat, D. S. & Oswald. 2009. Defining manipulative discourse: The pragmatics of cognitive illusions. The International Review of Pragmatics 1, 348–370. Terkourafi, M. 2016. The linguistics of politeness and social relations.
In K. Allan (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics, 221-235. New
York: Routledge. Additional/optional readings: Austin, J. L. 1955/1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Geurts, B. 2007. Implicature as a discourse phenomenon. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 261-275.
Huang, Y. 2016. Introduction: What is pragmatics? In Y. Huang (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.33 Papafragou, A. & J. Musolino. 2001. Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. IRCS Technical Reports Series. 29.Potts, C. 2014. Presupposition and implicature. In
S. Lapin & C. Fox (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Contemporary
Semantics, 2nd edition, 168-202. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Redmond, M. V. 2015. Face and politeness theories. English Technical Reports and White Papers. 2. Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Tello Rueda, Y. 2006. Developing pragmatic competence in a foreign language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8. Wellwood, A., R. Pancheva, V. Hacquard & C. Phillips. 2018. The anatomy of a comparative illusion. Journal of Semantics 35, 543-583. |
Complementary |
|
|
(*)The teaching guide is the document in which the URV publishes the information about all its courses. It is a public document and cannot be modified. Only in exceptional cases can it be revised by the competent agent or duly revised so that it is in line with current legislation. |
|