MICROECONOMICS
Subject code: 16254103
Print
Specific learning outcomes of the degree
Transversal learning outcomes of the degree
- STATIC
GAMES
- Representation
of a game in normal form
- Rationality
and information
- Solutions
to static games
- Mixed
strategies
- DYNAMIC
GAMES
- Representation
of a game in extensive form
- Solutions
to dynamic games
- Repeated
games
- MONOPOLY
- Concept
and causes of monopoly
- Profit
maximization of a monopolist
- Comparison
between monopoly and perfect competition: the social cost of monopoly
- Natural
monopoly
- Price
discrimination
- OLIGOPOLY
- Cournot
duopoly model
- Collusion
- Cartel
stability
- Stackelberg
duopoly model
- Barriers
to entry
- Bertrand
duopoly model
- CHOICE
UNDER UNCERTAINTY
- Expected
utility theory
- Risk
aversion
- Insurance
markets
- ASYMMETRIC
INFORMATION
- Moral
hazard
- Adverse
selection
- Signaling
- Principal-agent
problem
Other observations:
If the student pass the first call final exam, the final mark will be the weighted average of the mark of the final exam (60%) and the mark of the continuing assessment (10%(Seminars/Active Participation)+2x15%(2 Tests) = 40%).
If the student does not pass the first call final exam, the final mark will be the mark of the final exam.
USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURES
The use of artificial intelligence tools must strictly comply with the instructions given by the teaching staff and, in all cases, must be declared. Their unauthorized, excessive, or undeclared use in the completion of assessment activities is contrary to the principles of academic integrity and will result in a failing grade for the activity, without prejudice to the application of other disciplinary measures in accordance with the Academic Regulations for Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees and the URV Student Disciplinary Regulations.
The teaching staff may, at any time, establish complementary mechanisms to verify authorship and to require the oral defense or explanation of the submitted activities and/or assessment tasks.
Second call:
The second call exam has a weight of 100% of the final mark.
USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURES
The use of artificial intelligence tools must strictly comply with the instructions given by the teaching staff and, in all cases, must be declared. Their unauthorized, excessive, or undeclared use in the completion of assessment activities is contrary to the principles of academic integrity and will result in a failing grade for the activity, without prejudice to the application of other disciplinary measures in accordance with the Academic Regulations for Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees and the URV Student Disciplinary Regulations.
The teaching staff may, at any time, establish complementary mechanisms to verify authorship and to require the oral defense or explanation of the submitted activities and/or assessment tasks.
Basic bibliography
- ( Book ) Nicholson, Walter., Teoría microeconómica : principios básicos y aplicaciones , cop. 2004 Access to the CRAI
- ( Book ) Varian, Hal R. / Rabasco, Esther, trad., Microeconomía intermedia : un enfoque actual , DL 2015 Access to the CRAI
- ( Book ) Giménez Gómez, José M. / Llop Llop, Maria, autor / Manzano, Carolina, autor, Problemas resueltos de microeconomía intermedia , 2019 Access to the CRAI
-
(
Book
) Pindyck, Robert S. / Rubinfeld, Daniel L., autor, Pindyck, Robert S., Microeconomics. Castellà
Microeconomía , 2018 Access to the CRAI
Complementary bibliography
- ( Book ) Gravelle, Hugh. / Rees, Ray., Microeconomía , cop. 2006 Access to the CRAI